Friday, April 3, 2009

Christopher Adler....thank you Kyle

Christopher Adler, another name to add to my repertoire of American composers and another unique composer.

Scanning through his website the first thing to grab my attention, besides his exotic compositional contributions, was the courses that he teaches at the University of San Diego. Introduction to Sound Art, Digital Audio Composition, and Art and the Soundscape. The course description for Intro to Sound art
“examine a wide variety of cultural and artistic practices involving the making and experiencing of sounds, including acoustic ecology, deep listening, experimental music and sound art/sound sculpture, electronic and computer music, the artistic application of recording studio technology, invented and modified musical instruments, interactive music on the internet, algorithmic compositions, improvised music, DJ culture, noise music and glitch…”

Wow, what a mouth full but what an incredible course. Gone are the days where you can categorize music into performance, education, theory, or history. And gone are the days where you sit in class with only a textbook, blackboard, and a stuffy old professor. One can only imagine the forms of technology required to successfully teach this course. I think it is extraordinary how so many young musicians have created an entirely new niche for them selves, marketed it, and thrown it out to the world. And even more extraordinary is how receptive we seem to be to the changes in music today (Mike’s presentation was just a snippet of this). You almost have to sympathize with past innovators like Varese because of the limitations they were confronted with both mechanically and audience-wise. I can’t help but think of the fabulous contributions Varese could have made if he had the equipment and support that composers such as Adler have today.

I know I probably sound like a star struck teenager when I continuously say this but I sincerely am in awe of the opportunities available in the USA. I could delve into so many areas on this topic but ‘American innovators’ specifically, there is SO MUCH to be a part of. The recitals, the lectures, the interactive learning environment….so much to see….so little time. But back to my original thoughts on Adler and innovation.

I think one of the most captivating elements of the experience yesterday was Adler’s participation in the performance and learning process of his cross cultural compositions. I am not familiar with the history of why he chose the Thai and Korean tradition but I can only imagine the immense study and emersment that would have had to occur in order to create this cross cultural collaboration. I appreciated his obvious knowledge of the various musical traditions and his respect to maintain these elements in his compositions (I can’t help wondering how different music would be today if all composers offered this same level of respect to music of other cultures).

The whole experience only served to further tweak my interest in ethnomusicology and because Adler has provided a framework for western music and music of the orients to co-exist, it certainly makes these ancient musical traditions more accessible.

2 comments:

  1. Thank you for your post, Nicola! My experience in this class has been enhanced through your observations both during class and on the blog.

    Composition was an integral part of my undergraduate written theory work -- to experience first-hand the creation process has enhanced my appreciation of the gifts and skills of composers of all sorts of music and sound art. I thoroughly enjoyed our experience with Christopher Adler on Thursday. For me, watching his physical participation in the music became in a way my participation in the music. This is due to several aspects of my present state of musical being -- I am attention-challenged. So, I need multi-sensory input in order to stay connected when listening to recordings of extended and repetitive, highly-rhythmic music. In lieu of live musicians, I experienced the music through the visual of watching Adler's participation. Though so many of the individual elements of the music were gleaned from pre-existing sources, his obviously respectful and loving treatment and combination of them into a new "one" makes them new.

    Within my personal definition, Christopher Adler is very much an American Innovator.

    I am drawn myself to manuscript notation -- the connection to the composer is differently strong when the code is direction from her or his own hand.

    Side note: At Asbury, I was privileged to play quite a few new compositions by students -- both by composition majors and non-majors. What an indescribably honor and joy to humanly recreate the sounds they have imagined within them -- or at best heard on Finale. I was asked to play a piece this month, which won the composition honor this year at Asbury. Watching the body language and the facial expression of the composer [whom I have known since he was 5] as he heard the sounds live for the first time -- priceless.

    ReplyDelete